so avoiding my revision i came across an angry mob of bloggers who were talking about Terry Richardson and his sexual photos, now i have never really looked into it much, so i took a closer look - if i'm honest its just porn meets a fashion accessory to avert the eyes. So i had a bit of a debate with myself - in what ways could this be considered art and acceptable to little children searching the internet and looking at this for 'art'? The fact is to me he just looks like a dirty old man you find on edgeware road ready to pounce on the young ambitious women who want to kick start their modelling career- i think the fact that on the 'model for me' tab there's a picture of a door with the number 69 on it says it all - I don't know about you, but he needs to tone down his foreplay act as just because he's a high up photographer making it acceptable to the fashion industry does not make it acceptable to those who find this vulgar to an extent that its like porn - who agrees with me? (and please be nice it's my first blog!)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
